book icon noting abstracts
Abstract
Purpose

Depression among adolescents is a leading public health problem. Although screening for adolescent depression in primary care is strongly recommended, screening rates remain low. Effective quality improvement (QI) initiatives can facilitate change. This study aims to assess the impact of a QI learning collaborative on adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care in primary care.

Methods

Seventeen pediatric-serving practices in Vermont participated in a QI learning collaborative aimed at improving practitioner knowledge and office systems around adolescent depression screening. Monthly medical record reviews provided monitoring of adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care over 7 months for QI. Randomly sampled annual medical record review data allowed comparison of screening and initial plans of care after the QI learning collaborative between participating and 21 control practices.

Results

As practices improved their office systems around adolescent depression screening and initial plans of care, data showed marked improvement in depression screening at all 17 practices, from 34% to 97% over 7 months. Adolescents at participating practices had 3.5 times greater odds (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14–10.98, P = .03) of being screened for depression and 37.5 times greater odds (95% CI, 7.67–183.48, P < .0005) of being screened with a validated tool than adolescents at control practices, accounting for patient characteristics.

Conclusions

There were significant within practice increases in adolescent depression screening after a QI learning collaborative, as well as in comparison with control practices 1 year later.

Journal Article

Improving Adolescent Depression Screening in Pediatric Primary Care (This link will open in a new window.)

quotation mark icon for citations
Citation

Harder VS., Barry SE., French S, Consigli AB, Frankowski BL. Improving Adolescent Depression Screening in Pediatric Primary Care. Academic Pediatrics. 2019;19(8), 925-933. doi:10.1016/j.acap.2019.02.014

|     VCHIP Home     |     Research and Evaluation Home     |